Doctor accused of rogue hysterectomies investigated in women’s health scandal | Bolt Burdon Kemp Doctor accused of rogue hysterectomies investigated in women’s health scandal | Bolt Burdon Kemp

Find lawyer icon
Find your Lawyer

Free call back
Contact us
Round the clock support
Won't shy away from difficult cases
Committed to swiftly progressing claims

Doctor accused of rogue hysterectomies investigated in women’s health scandal

A gynaecologist accused of performing unnecessary and botched procedures on hundreds of women is a shocking reminder of how women’s health is often overlooked.

Daniel Hay, an obstetric and gynaecological specialist, caused “unnecessary harm” to women by carrying out gynaecological procedures such as caesarean sections, hysterectomies and sterilisation without considering alternative options.

The Royal Derby Hospital doctor was known to perform an unusually high number of surgeries per day, raising the question of whether he was cutting corners.

Among the numerous allegations were claims of unnecessary surgeries, incorrect procedures, and severe post-operative complications that could have been avoided with proper care and diligence.

Frustratingly, despite his colleagues’ unease, Hay’s practices went largely unchallenged for years.

In late 2018, concerns were raised by his colleagues and in April 2020, the NHS Trust revealed it was conducting a review into his methods between 2015 and 2018. This means in some cases women will have suffered the consequences of his actions for five years before action even began to take place.

Almost 400 women have since been contacted by the NHS as potential victims.

Can Daniel Hay still practise?

Hay ceased working for the University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust in June 2018, however, it was not until October 2020 that restrictions were placed on his medical licence. Hay officially relinquished his medical licence in July 2021. He has stated previously that he is retired.

In September 2022, Derbyshire Police officially launched a formal criminal investigation into the practices of Hay. Operation Land Guard is still ongoing and Hay said he is cooperating fully with the investigations and has pleaded guilty to charges.

Who is responsible?

While Hay’s actions were reprehensible, the situation also points to broader systemic issues within the healthcare institutions that employed him.

Hospitals and clinics are responsible for ensuring their medical staff adhere to the highest standards of care. However, in Hay’s case, there appears to have been lapses in oversight and accountability.

In May 2021, an interim report was published by NHS England which concluded there was “major concern” that at least 50 women had suffered harm as a result of Hay’s practices. It later transpired a further 69 women might also have been harmed.

The NHS Trust responsible for Hay’s employment issued a “full and unreserved” apology to the 119 women thought to be affected by Hay. This is a mere drop in the ocean however, as almost 400 women in total were contacted by the NHS following reports of “serious harm” suffered.

The Trust has admitted the care provided to the women affected fell well below the standard of care expected.

The full review has been completed, but the Trust is withholding the final report due to the ongoing police investigation.

Summary

The investigations into Hay highlight the need for rigorous adherence to professional standards, while also reminding us the trust placed in healthcare professionals must never be taken for granted. It also serves as yet another stark reminder that women’s health is often overlooked.

The case of Hay, and indeed every other case of rogue surgeons or doctors, underscores the necessity of robust systems of accountability and oversight in healthcare institutions. It emphasises the need for patient safety above all else and a safe environment that encourages medical professionals to speak up with their concerns without the fear of retaliation.

Moreover, it highlights the importance of transparency and communication between doctors and patients. Informed consent, thorough discussion of treatment options, and clear explanations of procedures are vital components of patient care that can prevent misunderstandings and errors.

If you have been affected

It is always unsettling to hear of a potential scandal involving medical treatment. If you have been treated by Hay, or have any concerns regarding potentially substandard gynaecology treatment, it may be sensible to seek independent legal advice.

Please note there is a time limit for bringing medical negligence claims, and this is strictly enforced by the courts. Any action must be brought within three years of the date of injury, or alternatively, the date of knowledge. If you are unsure about your limitation date, contact us and we can assist you.

Bolt Burdon Kemp is a leading medical negligence firm with more than 35 years’ experience in acting for people who have been injured due to substandard treatment. More specifically, our Women’s Health Team is highly knowledgeable about gynaecological claims.

A medical negligence claim will provide you with a formal legal investigation into what has happened, with evidence from independent medical experts. It will seek to compensate you for past and future pain, suffering and financial losses. It will provide peace of mind and funds to get the care and treatment needed to move forward.

Some of Our Accreditations

See more of our accreditations

We’re here to help you.

Want to talk to one of our experienced lawyers? We can call when it suits you for a no-obligation, strictly confidential chat.

Your browser is out of date. Please update your browser.

This site (and many others) provides a limited experience on unsupported browsers and not all functionality will work correctly or look its best.